Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holocaust education


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 05:44, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Holocaust education

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article was basically a personal essay by a new editor. When all the unsourced, improperly sourced and irrelevant material was removed, very little was left. What is actually there could easily be included in the Holocaust or Holocaust denial article if it is worth keeping. Jayjg (talk) 20:56, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete -- essay, not article. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:00, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Perhaps this was inspired by the existence of Holocaust denial, which would be an opposing concept. At any rate, the information belongs in existing articles, including Holocaust and Holocaust denial where necessary. JFHJr (㊟) 23:55, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 12 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete or merge -- No useful content that could not be in one of the other articles mentioned. I have not checked, but strongly suspect that there is in fact little or nothing worth merging.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:26, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's absolutely an article-worthy topic, but there's nothing to save here. Blow it up. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 19:17, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, incubate or rescue - perfectly good idea for an article. Bearian (talk) 21:25, 14 November 2011 (UTC) It appears clear that this can not, and will not, be fixed. Snow delete. Bearian (talk) 21:38, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete and/or merge to Holocaust or Holocaust denial. &mdash;SW&mdash; gab 22:35, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete this is an essay, not an encyclopedia article. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:22, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Good idea for an article, very bad attempt at an article. --DThomsen8 (talk) 00:40, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.