Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holocracy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  05:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Holocracy
Non-notable neologism with NPOV problems. Artw 05:40, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete POV, OR, WP:NOT. Yanksox 05:50, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism, doesn't even mean anything cool like hologram MPs. Jammo (SM247) 06:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is a personal essay, not an article. J I P  | Talk 10:35, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per Yanksox. Inner Earth 11:34, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Rob 13:32, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. "Holocracy" is a neologism that has been used by a variety of authors to mean quite different things, very different to the contents of this article. Paddles TC 15:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Yanksox and WP:SOAP. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:50, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Has 404 Ghits, with several apparent meanings.--Nydas 22:02, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly biased, soapbox even. Also, the word seems to mean whatever the author wants it to mean, Ive seen different definitions before. --Ushionna 16:34, 8 June 2006 (PST)
 * Delete per above. &mdash; Khoikhoi 03:53, 10 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.