Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holy Apostles Episcopal Church (Satellite Beach, Florida)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Bduke (talk) 08:54, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Holy Apostles Episcopal Church (Satellite Beach, Florida)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Church with questionable notability. Independent references noted sound like relatively trivial mentions/photos. Dougie WII (talk) 07:06, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. STORMTRACKER   94  12:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Large number of references.  Shouldn't delete on the basis of references that an editor thinks sound trivial.  Looking at the one secondary source on-line I find: "Again, in 1959, Satellite Beach made national news with half-page picture features in the 28 September issue of Life magazine and in the November issue of Popular Science on moving the sanctuary of Holy Apostles Episcopal Church from Fort Pierce by barge up the Indian River in July of that year."  Not too many churches make it into Life and Popular Science. Hobit (talk) 14:20, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Still, just a passing mention in a local website. As far as the magazines cited by that webpage (that, btw, was added after this AfD was filed), they're just about the movement of the structure and many, many structures such as these have been moved in a likewise manner over time and certainly not all moved structures are necessarily notable. -- Dougie WII (talk) 20:32, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. It has consistently been strongly maintained and supported at AfD that all denominations however small are notable. There is realy no other rule that can let us escape unending controversy. How many Christians were in the first Church? How many followers did Mohammed have at first?--Hu12 (talk) 03:00, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * It's not its own denomination, but rather a parish of a church that nobody disputes is notable. Rigadoun (talk) 07:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep According to references sourced in two independant sources (Hellier and Rights) including an extensive write up in one (Hellier). Dsmdgold (talk) 19:52, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.