Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holy Trinity Catholic Church (Los Angeles, California)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. CharlieEchoTango ( contact ) 06:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Holy Trinity Catholic Church (Los Angeles, California)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable church (as organisation) Night of the Big Wind  talk  15:40, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 30 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. No indication that the article satisfies WP:CHURCH. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 14:20, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Unremarkable church, not notable for age or architecture, with absolutely no coverage at Google News that I could find. The church's own website describes it simply as a "smaller, neighborhood parish".
 * Merge with Atwater Village, Los Angeles, California, where it is situated. This is the best solution for local churches.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:05, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice to recreation With a church size as a large congregation, there is a presumption of notability.  This is consistent with a Google news archive search for ["Holy Trinity Catholic Church" "los angeles"].  And nominator's claim of "non-notable" is a drive-by nomination unsupported by evidence.  However, the article has no references, so the issue of notability is only of academic interest, and there is no need to further analyze it.  For the same reason, there is nothing to merge.  Overcoming this problem is the same as writing the article from scratch, which as an encyclopedia, we should encourage, while also noting that it might be a good idea to start the new work at Atwater Village, Los Angeles, California as suggested above.  Unscintillating (talk) 22:36, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.