Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holy Trinity Lutheran Church, Elgin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Holy Trinity Lutheran Church, Elgin

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Run of the mill congregation. Many churches are notable because they're listed on the NRHP. This one is not and, apart from a single 100th anniversary article in a local newspaper, there is no other WP:SIGCOV. schetm (talk) 14:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. schetm (talk) 14:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. schetm (talk) 14:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  15:03, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  15:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  15:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable local congregation.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:29, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Like most local churches, this one looks NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:48, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable and only one source provided. Expertwikiguy (talk) 00:54, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - The building is more than 100 years old (pre-1921); it is a part of a historic district on the NARA website; and it is notable for its church its music program. It just barely meets my standards. Bearian (talk) 23:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:SIRS. Only two independent citations where one mentions the congregation's 100th anniversary and the other a passing mention for its taking part in a Christian unity program. If the church is part of a historic district it can be merged.  I don't see this having the criteria for a stand alone article. Blue Riband► 00:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.