Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HomeVestors of America


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Red Phoenix  talk  02:25, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

HomeVestors of America

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional article, content substantially created by SPAs (see talk) and sourced to literal press releases and passing mentions, little to no in-depth non-promotional coverage in article or a WP:BEFORE. Not the depth to pass WP:NCORP. David Gerard (talk) 08:02, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 08:02, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 08:02, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. There's justabout enough coverage, and I removed the promotionalism . I rarely do this nowadays, but it seemed worthwhile here.  DGG ( talk ) 06:39, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Most of the sources are from company database, and the article on WSJ is from its blog. Viztor (talk) 11:33, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:34, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:05, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's not every day I scroll through AfD and see something that I am familiar with without having to look it up, so that has to count for something. Meets WP:N, work on cleaning it up rather than deleting it. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages)Have a blessed day. 15:54, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have material, please do add it! - David Gerard (talk) 22:53, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep article passes GNG Thanks DGG. Lightburst (talk) 02:07, 8 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.