Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Home Alone House


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Merge with Home Alone. Davewild (talk) 12:19, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Home Alone House

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not reliably sourced, not really claiming notability, not really worth an article! Privatemusings (talk) 04:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * DO NOT DELETE This took me time and effort to put together. All I wanted was something good, not bad. Why is it up for deletion!? This is absurd and ridiculous. Why can't someone simply edit it so it meets whatever stupid standards it should. Someone who can help me from it being deleted and someone who is more Wikipedia knowledgeable! As owner of this material, no one can simply delete it anyway without a discussion! User:Boeing757  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.13.103.89 (talk) 23:14, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi! Welcome to Wikipedia.  Sorry that your first effort is up for deletion.  I'd be absolutely happy to help you get Home Alone House up to Wikipedia standards.  Leave me a message at User talk:Jclemens. Jclemens (talk) 23:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Not worth an article at all. No citations or anything.Tresiden (talk) 09:53, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge material to Home Alone, perhaps after the Cast section, or in a Trivia Production Notes or special "real world" section, or perhaps to a related article if there is one (eg: The making of ~). Easy to do, merged article would not be too long, seems a natural fit.  Material seems worth preserving in an appropriate article, just too trivial to Stand Alone, so to speak.  --T-dot ( Talk/ contribs ) 16:49, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:52, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless a WP:RS can tie it to the movie. If such a source is found, Merge instead per T-dot. Jclemens (talk) 18:42, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Found a source, added it to the article. Note that in Danish the location is included in the home alone article itself, although appears to be only sourced to IMDB.  There are a couple more sources for the location, but several of them look non-RS. Jclemens (talk) 01:10, 14 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, unless sources are found, then merge to Home Alone or similar; it's not notable enough for its own article. Mr. Absurd (talk) 22:41, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge to Home Alone. I say keep as a stub, because it applies to both Home Alone 1 and 2. If it's merged to HA1, then HA2 also needs a link to the subsection within HA1, and that's somwhat messy. If merged, the article should be left as a R with possibilities so that it could be expanded later if more information is found. I hate it when people want to delete short articles just because they are short. Sometimes a stub is all that's necessary to adequately describe something, and this seems to be such a case. Expand on it (and definitely reference it) if more information is found, but definitely don't delete without at least merging. -- Will scrlt  ( Talk ) 23:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge Not notable enough for its own article, but decent enough to be covered in the main article. – sgeureka t•c 08:14, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge or keep It now has citations and besides it serves an informative purpose so it can definitely be merged into the Home Alone article if need be but there is no reason to delete it. --Aksnitd (talk) 09:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - this could be reduced to a single line in the Home Alone article --T-rex 17:26, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Home Alone, it's referenced and will bring added value to the film article. RMHED (talk) 18:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.