Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Home Energy Resources Unit (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawing. Horrible spammy article but some evidence of actual coverage elsewhere, will work on it. Guy (Help!) 09:33, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Home Energy Resources Unit
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article has two kinds of sources: those based on press releases, and primary sources (e.g. patents). Oh, and it reads like a PR blurb. The fact of Reiuters and the BBC reporting the press rleases previously resulted in Keep, but the "Marsh test" (following the Bad PR script on how to identify churnalism) shows that these originated with the firm and do not have intellectual independence. Add to that the fact that it's identified as a "prototype", as of two years ago, with nothing available on the market yet that I can find. Guy (Help!) 21:23, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:41, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:42, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:42, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:43, 26 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.