Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homeless Coalition of Windsor-Essex County


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Homeless Coalition of Windsor-Essex County

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested PROD & PROD2 A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability. Codf1977 (talk) 14:52, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this organization. Joe Chill (talk) 20:15, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: As I mentioned on Talk:Homeless Coalition of Windsor-Essex County, this organization is an oversight organization for dozens of other humanitarian organizations in the area. I'm talking with one of the employees of the organization to get some more detailed information for the article. For reference, they have a home page, an entry in the Community Information Online Consortium and other directories, a facebook page, and are mentioned in many local news articles. If mention of these constitutes notability, I can add them and other information such as organizational history and activities to fill out the article. If these additions would still be insufficient for notability, then go ahead and delete the thing. Reinderientalk/contribs 15:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - non-notable organization. This is not a "lack of information" problem. It's a lack of notability problem that can't be fixed by just typing more stuff. -Drdisque (talk) 03:01, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete the independent, significant coverage in reliable sources seems non existent. Nuttah (talk) 16:09, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.