Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homeless International Flag


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 20:19, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Homeless International Flag

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and probably the COI guidelines (the creator declared their COI, but did not use AfC). Firestar464 (talk) 19:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:21, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. This Wikipedia entry is made for a self-promoted concept. The flag itself could be notable, but currently it is not: fails WP:SIGCOV. Most sources are social networks, which are not WP:RS. There is no indication in the wide media that this flag is actually used by homeless people around the world (aside from the claims self-made by author). // MitYehor (talk) 21:07, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per MitYehor. Medarduss (talk) 23:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete very limited coverage. Draken Bowser (talk) 13:19, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - no additional coverage found from my side, failing SIGCOV per description above. — Ixtal ( T / C ) &#8258; Non nobis solum. — Preceding undated comment added 11:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SIGCOV, WP:NOTINHERITED, and WP:SOAP. As discussed above, there is just not enough sourcing to justify inclusion. Homeless folks are notable as a concept; their flag is not. Worthy cause but not notable. Bearian (talk) 19:50, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per above fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:36, 1 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.