Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homeodynamic agriculture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Homeodynamic agriculture

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable concept. Unable to find any significant coverage in reliable sources unconnected to the topic. Bongo  matic  17:17, 23 September 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I think you might have to let this squeak by given those two sources, and also since Nastati is cited at least once. I grant you readily it's thin, though: weak keep. Drmies (talk) 02:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - it's significant enough in Italy and Greece as method of agriculture, adopted by over 400 farms. --EPadmirateur (talk) 22:11, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.