Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homeopathic Materia Medica (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Homeopathy. Tone 14:45, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Homeopathic Materia Medica
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

More than half of this short article is devoted to the necessary qualification that homeopathy is nonsense, and a discussion of its invention. The balance, still, over a decade since its creation and previous AfD, is nothing more than a dictionary definition. The search term is valid, but I think this should be turned into a redirect to the parent article, which is much more comprehensive and already includes this concept in more context. All this article does is add disappointment by explaining no more than the only article that directly references it, and that with less context, really because there's no more to say. Guy (help!) 13:27, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 13:31, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 13:31, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to homeopathy per nom, no evidence of stand-alone notability. IntoThinAir (talk) 15:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom. Homeopathy seems like the most relevant section that explains the phrase. I'm not opposed to landing on just the page title. --mikeu talk 22:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom. -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 10:25, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom and IntoThinAir. Girth Summit  (blether)  07:24, 25 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.