Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homeovestism (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  06:52, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Homeovestism
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

One person's concept from the 1970s and from the very dubious field of psychoanalysis. While it has received occasional mention elsewhere (often attributed to its creator), it has not received any sort of significant coverage in multiple, WP:Secondary WP:MEDRS review articles, as would be required for an alleged psychological concept such as this to be notable. Crossroads -talk- 06:00, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Crossroads -talk- 06:00, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Crossroads -talk- 06:00, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Crossroads -talk- 06:00, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychiatry-related deletion discussions. Crossroads -talk- 06:00, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. Crossroads -talk- 06:00, 14 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete, all the sources are primary and a cursory check of Google and Google scholar has turned up nothing on the subject not written by its creator besides passing mentions or brief quotations that don't add any substance. ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 06:05, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete In its current state, the article isn't worth keeping. A search on scholar doesn't bring up any notable secondary coverage. Hemiauchenia (talk) 06:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Most of sources are primary and are not reliable to qualify for WP:GNG. Purosinaloense (talk) 09:36, 15 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.