Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homeschool Spanish Academy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete housekeeping closure: 11:12, 3 December 2014 Anthony Appleyard deleted page Homeschool Spanish Academy (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page) czar  ⨹   04:20, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Homeschool Spanish Academy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject of this article does not appear to meet the general notability guideline or WP:ORG. Looking at the references provided, the writeup in Charisma magazine appears to be the only one that appears to discuss the subject of the article in depth (albeit with significant POV issues). The biographical sketch/interview from the Trinity website is about Ronald Fortin and his other project in Guatemala, but does not mention Homeschool Spanish Academy by name; the two-paragraph blurb in Language magazine reads more like an advertisement for the program's opportunities (among dozens of such brief blurbs) rather than actual in-depth journalistic coverage. I am unable to find anything else, and thus I do not believe there is sufficient in-depth coverage in multiple third-party sources to warrant a standalone article. Kinu t/c 16:37, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 22 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. No meaningful hits (other than a business listing) in secondary source databases ProQuest, Lexis Nexis, HighBeam, Questia, or Google Books. With a lack of significant coverage, it does not pass the general notability guideline. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future. czar  ♔   05:34, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 21:56, 28 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - this appears to be a small online academy, and a non-notable organization. "There's no there there." Fails WP:42. Bearian (talk) 01:08, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.