Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hominids of the Ringworld (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:51, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Hominids of the Ringworld
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm unable to find a single reliable, third party source for this subject independent of the Ringworld books. There are no sources and no real asseertion of notability, and most of the text is WP:PLOT details. There's also no obvious page to merge, but that's a possibility if one's identified. But as it is, there's no way this article could be expanded or cleaned up. Cúchullain t/ c 20:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 September 11.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 20:27, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:36, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:37, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:37, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Might count as original research – correct me if I'm wrong. The material is not enough to stand alone as its own article without sources. Rosalina2427  (talk to me) 18:23, 14 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not a single source.  Normally, I'd suggest redirect to Known Space per WP:ATD, but I don't see any of these even mentioned there, and it's an unlikely search term, so don't redirect.  Not to mention fails WP:V.  -- RoySmith (talk) 16:24, 19 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.