Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homo melior

Homo melior was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to redirect the article.

Doesn't seem to me to be a widely-recognised phrase in English, and therefore would not belong in English wikipedia. Deb 11:35, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dbiv 15:37, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Undecided. Where's Luthers 95 theses? Kim Bruning 18:30, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Merge with 95 Theses and redirect. And 95 Theses could sure use some work. -- Jmabel | Talk 20:56, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)
 * concur with Jmabel. Ancheta Wis 00:07, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * also concur with Jmabel. zoney &#09827; talk 12:00, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * agree with Jmabel. NeoJustin 01:45, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)
 * who is deleting these VfD pages during voting? I don't even want to look because I just know its gonna be someone who already bugs me enough. null vote. vote is 4 to 2 to not delete, but the page is gone.  Is 2 votes enough for consensus? I doubt that it is.Pedant 06:53, 2004 Nov 19 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.