Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homohawk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty ☀ 06:04, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Homohawk
Patented non-sensical term not deserving of a topic on Wikipedia. MOE .RON  talk  23:02, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * A Merge to fauxhawk seems appropriate here. --Liface 23:09, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * A Weak Delete Merge to fauxhawk seems appropriate if verified? From a quick check of the web it seems more like a neologism with somewhat wide use at the moment on discussion boards and chat rooms. Probably too much flash in the pan to be included??--Nick Y. 00:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism, per my prod. -- stillnotelf   is invisible  03:20, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism. - Rudykog 22:57, 27 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.