Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homosexuality and Incest

Homosexuality and Incest was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Extremely POV rant. Any article that starts "Same-sex marriages open door to consensual incest" needs deleting, imo. -- Graham &#9786; | Talk 12:59, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete, rant. Gazpacho 13:01, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: rant, original research, hopelessly non-NPOV, no formatting, no hope of improvement in that form. Shane King 13:17, Oct 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, hopelessly POV -- Ferkelparade &pi; 13:27, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Misnamed rant. The Santorum argument (which he got from an aide) was that same sex marriage based upon equal protection would allow any other group to argue for equal protection to get marriage.  It's a slippery slope fallacy, applicable only to the US, and not valid.  However, this author doesn't even seem to grasp the argument well.  POV, personal essay, inaccurate: delete. Geogre 14:10, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, and include Incest in movies and Inevitable incest in that deletion. andy 14:12, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * I've copyvio'd this. --jpgordon{gab} 15:56, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: stupidity of user. Dmn / [[User talk:Dmn|&#1332;&#1396;&#1398; ]] 23:53, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. [[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 16:39, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.