Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homs Province Ambush


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. clear consensus  DGG ( talk ) 17:12, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Homs Province Ambush

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The event does not meet the relevance and importance criteria of a Wikipedia page ChronicalUsual (talk) 07:57, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2011 December 2.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  14:05, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:46, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:46, 2 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Military actions are usually considered to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:57, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. It was one of the first major attacks on an military esablishment, it "marked a dangerous escalation in violence" (http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16117757) and a week later this attack and others led to the UN declaring the Syrian unrest as a "civil war"(http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/8929186/Syria-now-in-state-of-civil-war-says-United-Nations-as-death-toll-passes-4000-mark.html)  Goltak (talk) 17:23, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per others. EkoGraf (talk) 05:18, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing that cant be said in a few sentences at 2011 Syrian uprising. MilborneOne (talk) 22:33, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - a notable event, certainly among the first notable military operations by the defectors.Greyshark09 (talk) 07:10, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep- as others have said, this is one of the most significant military assaults by the FSA, it needs to stay, or at the very least be merged with another article. Besides, what harm is there in it staying ? there nothing about it thats no factual, i dont see a problem with it. If anyone dosnt like the article there simply dont look at it. Kspence-92 22:50 6 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.210.85.34 (talk)
 * Merge to 2011 Syrian uprising without prejudice to recreation if in hindsight and with more data this seems more prominient than the facts we've got at the moment indicate. Buckshot06 (talk) 15:57, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.