Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honestforum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Resistance is futile! Mailer Diablo 12:03, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Honestforum
Delete seems like a non-notable website to me J.J.Sagnella 08:41, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I'm gay. freshgavin  ΓΛĿЌ  10:24, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Also, this page is only has 31 link-backs. . Seems fairly unknown. ---J.Smith 11:00, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Advertisng Forbsey 11:31, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete As per my original reasons for requesting speedy deletion, ad, non-notable. American Patriot 1776 18:06, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep As one of the fastest growing fashion websites on the net we ask you not to delete this page. We are viewed by 20,000 unique users a month and this number is growing exponentially.  In addition, our site has some impressive projects which it has done and will continue to do.  Honestdave
 * Delete with extreme prejudice despite Honest Dave's no doubt altruistic objections. BrianGCrawfordMA 19:48, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Its a really useful venue and has experienced explosive growth over the past 6 months and will continue to. If presence of adverts alone is reason to remove a page, then someone should go remove google. Small websites have to pay for themselves, so it seems asinine to list the presence of google adwords as a sole reason for removing a listing in wikipedia http://www.google.com/search?q=honestforum&sa=N&revid=896041765&qpos=0&oi=revisions_inline
 * Above user has very few edits. J.J.Sagnella 19:03, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep the site! It's not for profit and helps innocent would-be eBay shoppers from being scammed by illegal, counterfeit merchandise.
 * Comment Above user has only one edit. J.J.Sagnella 20:19, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep This site is amazingly useful, and full of valuable resources.
 * Comment Above user has just 1 edit. J.J.Sagnella 07:32, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Total votes so far
 * Delete- 6 votes
 * Keep- 3 anons and the article creator.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.