Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honeycut


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Honeycut

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Minus one of their songs being featured in the commercials and opening song for old Apple products, I don't see much notable content related to this band. I'm not sure if they're even active anymore (their website is currently parked and being publicly listed for sale) and I haven't been able to find any sources about the band. The only sources I've been finding relate to "Honeycut Records" which appears to be unrelated to the band. Dawnbails (talk) 17:17, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Music,  and California. Dawnbails (talk) 17:17, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing found for this band, appears to be a cocktail bar in LA with the same name. Sourcing used in the article now is meh. Oaktree b (talk) 03:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Got plenty of press coverage for their 2006 debut album; see, e.g.,, , , , , . Meets WP:MUSIC. Chubbles (talk) 04:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
 * While I'm iffy about the sources you've provided, I'd say that it'd at least make sense to draftify this article if others believe that they're reliable enough to use. The article currently stands on one singular source right now. Dawnbails (talk) 00:55, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The advice at WP:AFDTODRAFT discourages draftifying as a solution to problems identified at AfD, and I have to agree; if a subject is notable, the correct course of action is not to remove the article, temporary or permanently (and most draftified articles don't come back). Chubbles (talk) 04:57, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relisting to review new sources and to consider Draftification. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting, given the new sources, this may be closed as No consensus. And, by the way, I've seen plenty of articles that were Draftified appear again in the main space, the problem is actually that they are brought back to main space immediately after being moved to Draft space without a lot of work being done to address their problems. But sometimes a little extra time in Draft space can result in an improved article. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per Oaktree Graywalls (talk) 04:17, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep due to sources Chubbles identified, specifically the SPIN article Elttaruuu (talk) 10:58, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * What SPIN article? I am not seeing what you're talking about. Please name the specific link. Graywalls (talk) 18:55, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * 5th link Elttaruuu (talk) 20:19, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep as per the reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion such as Spin, Popcrush, AllMusic as per WikiProject Albums/Sources and others such as East Bay Times so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.