Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honeymoon period


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:36, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Honeymoon period

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Dicdef unsourced since forever, stub, no chance of expansion. No one can be arsed to fix it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 03:04, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:00, 9 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. One part definition, one part WP:OR. I found this article, which says on average it's two years, six months, and 25 days, but what else is there to say? The honeymoon's over. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:53, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTDICDEF. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  09:53, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.