Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Kong 97 (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) &mdash; fortuna  velut luna  07:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Hong Kong 97 (video game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No notability asserted. Game was made by an obscure publisher. Content is largely OR. Simply being reviewed by AVGN does not mean it's notable. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:08, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:08, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:08, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. With the WP:VG/RS custom Google search engine, I found some additional sources. It's discussed in-depth by Eurogamer and Kotaku, and it's mentioned by GamesRadar. With Hardcore101 and Angry Video Game Nerd, I believe notability has been met. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:43, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note that Eurogamer is about an entirely unrelated game (HK97 mentioned in comments), and GamesRadar only comments offhand on it. Jimbo1qaz (talk) 03:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Also this article from China Uncensored, with sources above easily passes WP:GNG. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 08:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep GNG per the sources displayed above. L3X1 (distænt write)  03:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.