Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Kong Ghost Stories


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:04, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Hong Kong Ghost Stories

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Possible a non-notable film. No third-party coverage of film. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 16:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:03, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Asia,  and Hong Kong. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 16:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: There is a review in the South China Morning Post here, a review in The New Paper and a review in The Straits Times. There is some coverage here. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 14:39, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. The South China Morning Post is RS per WP:RSP, The Straits Times is situational, but there is consensus that it is generally reliable so long as the Singapore government is not involved in its coverage. As the Singapore government wouldn't be involved in a film review, IMHO this is also a RS in this context. The New Paper is a tabloid and I'm uncertain of whether it counts as a WP:RS, but with two newspapers IMO this borderline passes WP:GNG and also possibly passes WP:NFILM's first criteria- The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics  as SCMP and The Straits Tiems are well-known national ones, these critics might be nationally known.  VickKiang   (talk)  21:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.