Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Kong Institute of Patent Attorneys


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarah-Jane (talk) 15:49, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Hong Kong Institute of Patent Attorneys

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Failed WP:GNG, except official websites, most other websites only mentioned the organization without introductions and explanations of activities of the organization. Billytanghh (talk) 03:52, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:36, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as the current version is so unacceptable, it may even be acceptable G11 speedy material. Delete for now unless better coverage can be found. SwisterTwister   talk  07:17, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Although the article attached many references, all references cannot fulfill WP:GNG and WP:RS. This private organization is a course provider, thus, that is a private school. If a company's article cannot achieve sufficient WP:GNG sources, this article is similar as an advisement for promotion. --Thomas.Lu (talk) 17:59, 8 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.