Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Lok Yuen International School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of primary schools in Hong Kong. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 19:35, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Hong Lok Yuen International School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD; removed without an edit summary. The fairly short brief article, which is written like an advertisement, is about a non-notable school that fails WP:NHS and WP:GNG. Bryce ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 02:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 4 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete and/or redirect. As I understand is our convention with schools through grade six, absent unusual circumstances.--Epeefleche (talk) 16:38, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect/Merge to locality or school governing body per longstanding consensus. I'm also expressing concern with the large numbers of school nominations at the moment; it can't be expected that all editors be able to respond to this mass act of deletionist ideology. &tilde;danjel [ talk | contribs ] 00:29, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect (blank, and merge any useful  content) to  List of primary schools in Hong Kong. Non   notable schools are generally  not  deleted; instead,  as demonstrated by 100s of AfD closures, they are redirected to  the article about  the school district (USA) or to  the article about  the locality (rest  of the world). --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Kud. Out of curiosity, I noticed that you suggested merging any useful content.  From what I can see, all of the content here is unreferenced -- no references to non-RSs, let alone RSs.  Are you suggesting that any of this content should be merged?  Many thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 19:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

NOTE for closer: if this AfD is closed as 'redirect', please remember to include the  template on  the redirect  page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.