Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong fu pai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 18:50, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Hong fu pai

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Google search turns up very minimal hits & none for this martial art's alleged Chinese name. Most likely a newly "invented" system unless anyone can provide references to show otherwise ThaddeusB (talk) 02:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I can find no mention of this martial arts on Google (see this search (with the query "紅虎派") and this search (with the query "Hong Fu Pai"). Per the nominator, this is likely a madeup system. Cunard (talk) 05:19, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Non notable move, (if it even exists). Only mentions found online are from blogs, and only 1 entry was found. As Cunard mentioned above, I think it may be a hoax. Netalarm   talk  03:12, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Another hoax. Joe Chill (talk) 13:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacks evidence of “notability” and is presently indistinguishable from gibberish. —SlamDiego&#8592;T 13:25, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as an apparent hoax. Irbisgreif (talk) 15:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I searched it on Bing and there was nothing, so I say there's no need for it. Shark96z (talk) 19:28, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.