Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honkey

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep (8 keep, 3 delete; if margin is not large enough it defaults to keep due to lack of consensus anyway). - Mgm|(talk) 13:16, July 22, 2005 (UTC)

Honkey
Dicdef of a derogatory word; it is already in Wiktionary and I don't see it having encyclopedic potential. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 11:03, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. dicdef, wiktionary already has info on origins too. --TheMidnighters 12:04, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, like nigger. Kappa 12:15, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and Expand per kappa Youngamerican 13:06, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I can understand, but expand how? Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 14:11, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * A bit more could be done on its use in popular culture. If the motion for deletion fails, I will work on it.Youngamerican 15:01, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep agree with Youngamerican
 * keeep please we have dox on many derogatory words Yuckfoo 22:25, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete slang dicdef. JamesBurns 04:45, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, the word's history makes it encyclopedic (but some sources would sure be nice!) --Angr/undefined 07:45, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kappa. Xoloz 15:45, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Curse words and derogatory terms generally get their own articles (see fuck).  Almafeta 16:48, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This absolutely belongs in wiktionary, not here. Nandesuka 20:38, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep' per Kappa. Saswann 16:57, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.