Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hood Politics (Kendrick Lamar song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to To Pimp a Butterfly. (non-admin closure) sst ✈  03:14, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Hood Politics (Kendrick Lamar song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Politics_(Kendrick_Lamar_song) )

I feel like 5 of the non-singles on To Pimp a Butterfly have short stub articles that have shown no sign of expansion and Hood Politics is the worst offender of them all. Sure it charted, but other than shown charts (which are already represented on the discography page) the content is too minimal to justify having it's own article. I also suggest deleting the articles for: Institutionalized (Kendrick Lamar song), Momma (Kendrick Lamar song), U (Kendrick Lamar song), and For Sale? (Interlude) for the same reasons. These articles do not say much about the songs other than the fact that they charted, are on To Pimp a Butterfly, and maybe 1 little side fact for some of them (which could be instead said on the TPAB main page.) I definitely think it would be beneficial to delete them, especially Hood Politics. -Mrmoustache14 (talk) 15:23, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: We now live in a time in which every song from an album can chart in the week of its release due to the way charting methods have rapidly changed. A song meeting the first criteria of WP:NSONGS is no longer satisfactory to prove notability. I'd also support the deletion of the other four songs mentioned.  Azealia 911  talk  23:43, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  20:37, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to To Pimp a Butterfly. Note: the list in WP:NSONGS is NOT the criteria which makes a song notable or not. The first paragraph of NSONGS is the criteria, the list that comes after it is simply some of the things that can help it meet the criteria of the first paragraph. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 17:25, 30 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.