Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoon (fiction)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Uplift Universe. Tone 20:12, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Hoon (fiction)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced article on a fictional species that fails WP:GNG and MOS:REALWORLD. This nomination is related to List of Uplift Universe species, also at AfD RetiredDuke (talk) 22:49, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they have the same issues w/ lack of sources and failure of GNG/MOSREALWORLD:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  M h hossein   talk 14:18, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge into Uplift; too crufty for its own article. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 21:10, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment seems like this isn't getting a lot of attention, so I'm just going to argue that I don't agree with a merger since none of the content is reliably sourced. If the best sources we can get on these creatures are the novels they originated from, then this is just a lot of fan-crufty original research. And whether in these articles or in another article, the content still fails MOS:REALWORLD since there's no secondary discussion of these topics at all. RetiredDuke (talk) 11:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:26, 18 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge without a redirect (too many hoons:)) to an appropriate section of Uplift Universe, no sourcing to sustain a standalone article, ditto the others. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:29, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge selectively to Uplift Universe. Much of the information are unnecessary therefore can be trimmed before merging. Apart from some passing mentions, I can't see RS that deals with the subject in depth, so deletion is also a possibility. Hzh (talk) 13:46, 18 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.