Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hootenanny (store)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was '''delete; no rationale provided to keep beyond "let's include everything we can!" AfD is a debate, not a vote'''. Johnleemk | Talk 13:23, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Hootenanny (store)

 * Delete: Non-notable clothing store that sounds like half the clothing stores in every mall in the world. —Wknight94 (talk) 20:53, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. In its current form, the article doesn't do anything to distinguish it from any other "alternative" clothing store.  Google revealed nothing of value for inclusion to merit a keep.  --Kinu 22:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. per nom. - Chairman S. 04:15, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Newbury Comics, the corporate parent, which is quite notable as a major regional record store chain. Haikupoet 06:14, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 'comment Do you have a source for this? I've never heard this before Lyo 04:08, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep The store clearly exists. Kurt Weber 18:20, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Exists isn't the issue. Is it encyclopedia-worthy?  If so, then I'll get in my car and start pumping in dozens of clothing store articles before I get to the county line.  —Wknight94 (talk) 19:35, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Go right ahead. Everything that exists is indeed worthy of an article.  Kurt Weber 23:23, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Go for it man. If it has any potential of helping anyone what harm does it do in existing? Lyo 22:43, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: The Inclusionist Mantra. Very well recited.  I don't buy it until I start seeing someone including everything they see - which few inclusionists seems to do.  I want every grain of sand, every 60MPH street sign, every container of every brand of strawberry jelly &mdash; everything.  They all exist.  If you have two copies of a 1965 Felix Millan baseball card and one has a crease and one doesn't - that's two articles. —Wknight94 (talk) 00:08, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Deletionists don't delete everything they see. So why would inclusionists include everything they see. Lyo 03:01, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I was referring to Kurt Weber's "everything that exists is indeed worthy of an article". So let's get busy creating.  Soon, Wikipedia will the most boring site on the web.  —Wknight94 (talk) 03:16, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Maybe I do this diffrentlly from everyone. But when I'm lookiing for an article on wikipedia I run a search. I don't look through all of the articles. So the ones I don't care about don't really affect me. So I doubt more articles would make this the most boring site. Lyo 03:40, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Wknight94's comment. Stifle 00:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 14:33, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It may exist, but it seems totally non-notable. This was the perfect articel for prod. DES (talk) 17:27, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I did and it was de-prodded. —Wknight94 (talk) 17:45, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kurt Weber Lyo 22:30, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Newbury Comics per Haikupoet, or keep. Kappa 03:59, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable, no claim to notability. No merge, no redirect. Ifnord 18:57, 9 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.