Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hope Hicks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) JudgeRM   (talk to me)  01:24, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Hope Hicks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A staffer on a political campaign born in 1988. While the candidate is notable, it doesn't confer notability on everyone who works on his campaign. Tataral (talk) 05:06, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree that the candidate's notability doesn't transfer to her. Her coverage establishes it for her. Town and Country Mag, GQ, WaPo, NY Post, Cosmo, Marie Claire, NY Times, Sydney Morning Herald, Direct Matin. Her age is irrelevant, don't know why you mentioned it. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:36, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep she has her own coverage in numerous major reliable sources, and certainly qualifies. Rjensen (talk) 08:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:36, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:36, 23 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep she has her own coverage in numerous major reliable sources.--ML (talk) 14:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, Hope Hicks Springs Eternal. And per above comments. Randy Kryn 14:37, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Per multiple sources found like the New York Times, WP:Before might've helped. GuzzyG (talk) 10:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Numerous profiles establish notability. Instaurare (talk) 23:51, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Disagree with nominating statement. Spokesperson for President-elect is notable by position alone. But even if it weren't, notability is established in references. Politico16 (talk) 18:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.