Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horatio Bunce


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Will userify if anyone has sources and wants to rewrite it. Courcelles 23:05, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Horatio Bunce

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Seemingly unremarkable fictional character created by a fictional character in a piece of fiction. Fails WP:NOTABILITY. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:03, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - the story isn't notable enough to have its own page, the character even less so. Article appears to exist because a couple of political groups have mentioned the character. Roscelese (talk) 13:55, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article is very confusing and it is difficult to try and understand what it is supposed to be about. Some of the references seem to be duplicates (just on different websites), and others aren't about this character. If this story was a significantly commented upon story, whether or not it is true or not, then there could be an article on it. However, its notability is not demonstrated. Quantpole (talk) 14:23, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails notability as a non-notable fictional character. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:00, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Rewrite a political commentary from the 19th century should have some references. But the important thing about this story isn't the Bunce character, and what's here should be rewritten into an article on the story itself.  Incubation may be a good option, but if there's no one willing to fix it up... Jclemens (talk) 17:50, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.