Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hordak (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. &mdash; Scientizzle 16:58, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Hordak (band)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't see any evidence this band is notable for inclusion in an encyclopedia Oniononion (talk) 03:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  13:37, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SorryGuy  Talk  01:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Three self released albums and an interview and a review from a metal website is not sufficient to establish that this band is notable.Beeblbrox (talk) 02:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak merge: You could always make a note of it under Hordak. Duncan1800 (talk) 14:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I would say keep if the interview and review were from two separate reliable entities, but I agree with Beeblbrox, that it is not enough to establish notability and fails WP:Music. ♫ Cricket02 (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for the notability reasons that have already been stated above.   Esradekan Gibb       "Talk" 07:19, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.