Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horizon Manila


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 10:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Horizon Manila

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:CRYSTALBALL, no definite construction date nor significant coverage for this specific project in secondary sources. ◢  Ganbaruby!   (Say hi!) 03:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  ◢  Ganbaruby!   (Say hi!) 03:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  ◢  Ganbaruby!   (Say hi!) 03:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: The project was already approved by the Philippine Reclamation Authority and will proceed construction the second quarter of 2021. From 25 reclamation projects in Manila Bay with varying stages, only four were approved as of December 2019 by PRA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PH 0447 (talk • contribs) 11:34, October 21, 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. WP:CRYSTAL item 1 states that "Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place". One of the latest articles reported that the project proponent is only "targeting to break ground in the second quarter of next year". Duterte has also explicitly stated his opposition against the reclamation project. It is a sign that it is still not definite.  Hiwilms   Talk   12:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:CRYSTALBALL. It remains to be seen if the project will push through or not. So, it's WP:TOOSOON at most. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 02:00, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - it has gotten lots of coverage and even Pinoys here in New York are chatting it up. Userfy if needed. Bearian (talk) 18:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: Please provide your sources/proof for "lots of coverage" and "Pinoys here in New York are chatting it up".  Hiwilms   Talk   06:11, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:04, 29 October 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pamzeis (talk) 05:13, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: Changed my vote, per Bearian. I recently realized that, unlike similar AfDs, the project did push through. I even found recent sources about it:, and .  ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you. By "chatting up" I mean my partner and his friends are talking about it on social media. Bearian (talk) 18:29, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I added the third source cited by . Bearian (talk) 18:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep per Superastig. SportingFlyer  T · C  00:39, 13 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.