Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horlick, Washington


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Horlick, Washington

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is across the river from Bristol, and the situation is essentially the same, with two small twists. First, there;s a sort of suburban community southeast of the historical siding/station (the line has been taken up since), but a trip back through the topos show the two have no connection. Second, it would be awfully nice if the articles related what the sources actually said. In this case, it turns out that Horlicks is not really "a type of hot drink": it is "a brand of malted milk", which is also what the article on the foodstuff says as well. In this case it makes no real difference, but really, we do have some obligation towards accuracy. In any case, it's just another non-notable siding/station. Mangoe (talk) 05:29, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Engr.  Smitty   Werben 05:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Engr.  Smitty   Werben 05:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. - Horlicks is typically drunk hot, it's also British slang for "a total mess" (because it sounds like "bollocks"), which I guess is appropriate here. It's notable that even the book source just attributes this statement to the vice-president of the Chicago, St. Paul, and Milwaukee railway, who may well not be that authoritative a source? It also highlights that this may not have been a town at all, but instead simply a railway station, otherwise why ask that particular person about it.? FOARP (talk) 11:16, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No evidence of a community here. –dlthewave ☎ 06:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.