Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hormonology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Deathphoenix ʕ 20:01, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Hormonology
Not an article, but an argument for making one. The creator has twice removed a prod tag without improving it. See talk:Hormonology. Delete gadfium 19:28, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Google seems to return a small handful of hits from real scientists and a huge amount of absolute garbage ("your hormone horoscope"???). Unless a clear definition can be produced to distinguish this term from Endocrinology, this should go. Fan1967 21:38, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete no context, POV. There's other ways to place an article, as I recall.  This can be deleted until someone comes up with one.  Tychocat 21:44, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. Endocrinology does include the study of the effects that hormones have upon the body, and it is anti-science to suggest otherwise. - Richardcavell 04:14, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete "I believe Hormonology will become a viable study" -- I believe more research by author will find ... more research by a whole lot of people called scientists. I think the article is just based on mistaken understanding and lack of understanding. Shenme 04:36, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.