Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horn fact

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 06:34, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)

Horn fact
Non-notable neologism or geek jargon (relax, I'll self-identify as a geek). None of the 41 displayed hits match this dic def. Niteowlneils 18:36, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, codswallop vanity nelogism. Wyss 19:41, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete this neologism crap. Zzyzx11 19:56, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Sadly, I can't think of a speedy criterion that fits. Wyss 21:55, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Horn clause. This is not a neologism or vanity or a speedy candidate. I think this can be expanded by subject matter experts. jni 06:55, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * I'd say a redirect would be unhelpful. There's no such thing as a Horn fact. Wyss 19:29, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.