Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horror House (2012 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:51, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Horror House (2012 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable film sourced only from IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes. Search for major news reviews turned up nothing. A412 (Talk &bull; C) 01:55, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: I found no sources. I'm not even sure if the film actually exists. SL93 (talk) 19:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: This movie certainly does exist. Not only can you find pieces of it on YouTube, but also there are multiple images of it if you search on Google.  There is also a brief but decent review of it on Horrorbug's website (http://horrorbug.com/horror-house-2012/) as well as on dreadcentral.com (http://www.dreadcentral.com/news/47433/lloyd-kaufman-stars-in-upcoming-anthology-horror-house/). You can even watch the trailer on Amazon video - including reviews.(https://www.amazon.com/Horror-House-Lloyd-Kaufman/dp/B00FL48YZ8).   But if you still doubt it, their own website is still up: www.horror-house.com where it lists a number of sources and medias that you can rent or buy it on including iTunes, Xbox Live and Google Play.  Sweet Home Films LLC, producer of the film, also mentions the movie on their Facebook page. Encyes (talk) 16:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:37, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:37, 24 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. The film can be watched, but there really isn't anything out there that would be considered a reliable source that would show notability per Wikipedia's guidelines. A film is not automatically notable because it exists (WP:ITEXISTS) and can be purchased. The Horrorbug website would be considered a self-published blog-type source on Wikipedia, as there is nothing on the site that shows its editorial process. Most review websites along these lines aren't considered to be reliable sources. It's not really anything against these sites - I actually have a few websites that I check fairly religiously that would be considered SPS on here (at least at this point in time) such as Culture Crypt - it's just that Wikipedia is fairly discerning when it comes to sourcing. The Dread Central source is OK, but wouldn't be enough on its own to establish notability for the film. A search brought up little that would show that this movie would pass notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:50, 26 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.