Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horse Racing TV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Horse Racing TV

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article has been written like an advertisement since its inception, and most of the edits since Sept 2010 have been by people associated with the company. No evidence of notability &mdash; Google comes up with nothing. If this had been a new article, I would have speedied it.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:37, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Project Thoroughbred Racing here. Tend to agree with nom: article lacks independent sources and is promotional in tone. I am going to dig around and see if I can improve it. Will notify here if I make any major edits.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 11:08, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:13, 30 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Cable network with national reach and on known providers. The writing is promotional, but it can be fixed rather easily.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 07:00, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. National network.  Hundreds of references on GNews .  Edit the promotional stuff, keep the facts. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:08, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.