Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horsecastle Chapel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 14:47, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Horsecastle Chapel

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I am unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. &mdash; Rod talk 09:06, 4 February 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 00:22, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as an ordinary church and therefore non-notable. StAnselm (talk) 21:36, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete Usually I would consider churches notable, but this one seem to be a one-congregation only church and as such is not notable. Travelbird (talk) 00:58, 12 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Checking the Google News, Scholar & Books links fails to find any sign of significant coverage in reliable sources. From a look at Google StreetView, this is clearly a fairly recent building so it's unlikely we're missing important older sources, as would be a worry for a small but ancient parish church. Qwfp (talk) 09:26, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.