Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horstmann technique


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Stifle (talk) 11:50, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Horstmann technique

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This minor variation on a hyperbolic million other massage techniques is not mentioned at PubMed or NCCAM, nor is it listed in the Gale Encyclopedia of Alternative Medicine or other usual suspects. All of the internet hits seem to be either substantively copied from the originator's website or mere directory listings. While this does confirm that someone invented this technique and started selling classes, it does not provide anything with which to work for improving the article. WP:NOT indicates that this article should be deleted until independent notable sources mention it. - Eldereft ~(s)talk~ 16:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nominator. - Eldereft ~(s)talk~ 17:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.   —- Eldereft ~(s)talk~ 17:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   —- Eldereft ~(s)talk~ 17:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep, I have papers but little time. Electron9 (talk) 18:57, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Then please by all means share what they are or where they might be found. If notability can be established I have no problem withdrawing this nomination. - Eldereft ~(s)talk~ 17:23, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:Fringe theories, the absolute lack of reliable sources point that this massage is just another massage. ⇨ EconomistBR ⇦   Talk  06:56, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability and reliable sources. Dimitrii (talk) 04:25, 26 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.