Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horton Gallery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. L Faraone  00:05, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Horton Gallery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable business, only reference is in a non WP:RS blog. Wikipedia is not a place to make a reputation it is a place that records reputations already made. Notability is not inherited from a list of artists. CSD was declined, hence AfD now. Fiddle  Faddle  21:02, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak delete we have New York Times references, but it's just not enough.--TelevisionMan13 (talk) 22:45, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * This !vote has been struck as coming from a sockpuppet account. See this SPI. - The Bushranger One ping only 17:28, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 16 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Note that references have increased in number, but are. at present, insufficient in quality. the NY Times one is a passing mention only, and the others fail WP:RS. That something exists is fine, but that does not of itself, make it notable. Some sort of notability must be asserted and verified. 11:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC) Fiddle  Faddle
 * Delete as promotional. There are tons of galleries in New York. No reason to have an article on all of them.  Ignatz mice•talk 13:35, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Insufficient coverage to establish notability. 1292simon (talk) 12:11, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.