Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoshang Pearl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 04:05, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Hoshang Pearl

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a non-notable housing development which has not been completed yet. The only RS I found containing significant coverage was this article which mentioned that the project was approved. Other than this there's a trivial mention here but I don't see anything else after that. Housing developments are not inherently notable (See WP:GEOFEAT) unless there is significant coverage. I'm also concerned that this article may be used for promotion given the elaborate Template:Bahria Town Group attached to it. -- Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:28, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:28, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:28, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:28, 24 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom; non-notable building projection, which is not even finished at this time. Promo piece. Kierzek (talk) 15:55, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO; the article exists to promote the business, and provides no indictions of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:11, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing all three elements of my standards. No reliable sources prove it exists or has been completed. There are unlikely to be many reliable sources in English. There are no people living there yet, and neither census records nor an estimated occupancy are yet available. Even when it will be completed, it is just another run of the mill development. Bearian (talk) 21:04, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete by all means as not only is this not actually established yet, but it's merely then advertising what it to be planned, which is still advertising. SwisterTwister   talk  00:34, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.