Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hospitality Lane District, San Bernardino


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as per positive consensus that affirms WP:GNG requirements are met. There are no calls for deletion outside of the nominator. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended (talk) 01:33, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Hospitality Lane District, San Bernardino

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced permastub about a small cluster of non-notable hotels next to the San Bernardino Freeway. Had only 3-4 sentences BEFORE I had to remove one that violated POV p  b  p  21:20, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:42, 12 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. I found plenty of news coverage of this district, which I added to the article. It's experienced an economic boom lately and it's one of the few prosperous parts of San Bernardino, and it now clearly passes the GNG. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 23:56, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Not clearly...all your sources appear to be local papers p  b  p  00:18, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * They're regional papers, and considering Riverside-San Bernardino is America's 13th largest metropolitan area, that's pretty significant. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 01:36, 13 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Major economic district for America's 13th largest metro anchor city, San Bernardino. It's actually more of a neighborhood now with housing anchored around the 92408 zip-code. House1090 (talk) 00:55, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - There appears to be plenty of secondary coverage of this district. When an article is currently un-sourced that can be sourced, per WP:AFD, AfD is inappropriate.--Oakshade (talk) 01:10, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - This topic appears to pass WP:GNG per the 9 sources now in the article. Thanks to User:TheCatalyst31 for expanding the article and adding sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:52, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep article has enough significant coverage in reliable sources to be an article. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 15:45, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.