Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hospitality architecture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. OR, POV, not notable, unencyclopaedic tone Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:54, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Hospitality architecture

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I would nominate this for speedy deletion if I felt it fit any of the categories. This is clearly a paper with very notable OR and POV writing and is not notable. JDDJS (talk) 17:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:TNT, I'd say. An article may well be possible on this topic but this isn't it. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - Copyright infringement. Per Earwig much of this article is copied word for word from several sources. — Maile (talk) 19:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - yes, this appears to be a copyvio. It is written in what we'd consider to be an essay-like way, all WP:OR and WP:POV, and it has the hallmarks of a copy-and-paste straight into the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - this does appear to be copyright violation. It is apparently a term used to refer a sub-field of architecture, but not sure if it's a notable area for its own article. Given the copyright issue, that question must be left for another day. Chris vLS (talk) 04:04, 22 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.