Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hostocol (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:25, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Hostocol
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced article about a newly-founded web hosting company. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. - MrX 00:32, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 22 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete – The article (and the company itself) attempts to make claim to notability, but the few amount of web results, in addition to "quoting" Obi-wan Kenobi on their webpage is evidence of a lack of any true sort of notability, and puts their claim as one of the fastest growing web hosting companies in India into question. Until Hostocol breaks any major press it will likely remain a permastub if anything, as the only sources I can find out their for Hostocol are blogs and items from the company itself. Delete.  TheAustinMan (Talk·Works) 03:07, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:CORP pretty badly, Wikipedia is not Yellow Pages. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:48, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * delete blatant advert. Almost speedy delete. LibStar (talk) 10:31, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete for now - Too new to build substance and multiple News searches only found that one press release. Sometimes, a company will use press releases and maybe eventually get news coverage. The press release is for a partnership which is a good sign but now it depends on the future if this company holds its ground. No prejudice towards a future article. SwisterTwister   talk  19:05, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete almost considered applying for speedy, but I felt it didn't fit. Still spam though. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 22:24, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.