Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HotMen CoolBoyz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

HotMen CoolBoyz

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The one source cited (https://books.google.com.au/books?id=m6Lh0hu-2xUC&pg=PA246&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false) only briefly mentions the movie, and I can't find any other sources Ficaia (talk) 10:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. don’t think I’ve ever seen an article point out in its own text that the thing was ignored by the press. Hyperbolick (talk) 11:29, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Sexuality and gender,  and Denmark.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:18, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:55, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Literally no sources except for a listing in the index of a book, which merely notes that the film exists. Zaathras (talk) 13:04, 10 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.