Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot Carl (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Stifle 14:34, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Hot Carl
Unencyclopedic slang definition. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. This was nominated for deletion once before on August 1, 2005 with no consensus. I merged the material in this article with Sexual slang, and redirected, but I was reverted. Brian G. Crawford 03:13, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge per nom; Wikipedia is not the Urban Dictionary -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 03:17, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * There is nothing wrong with having hot carl on this site. It is an act that has and will occur, so how is that different from having the term "war" on this site?  This is an encyclopedia in which people can look up information on just about anything, and this is definitely one of those topics.  Not to mention, it doesn't break any of the site's deletion policies. —This unsigned comment was added by 24.106.140.254 (talk • contribs).
 * Redirect since it is already merged. kotepho 03:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect. Hot Karl (note the K) was redirected to Anal-oral contact.  Maybe this should be too, but since it is unencylopedic in style, and nn and non-WP:V it should probably be deleted from Sexual slang as well. Esquizombi 05:06, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * redirect please to Anal-oral contact term has 75,000 google hits related Yuckfoo 05:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, there is no evidence that an actual sexual practice is referred to by this name in the real world by the people who perform it (this is not to say that some people do not engage in activities similar to what is described). It's kind of a well known sexual myth-joke. -- Kjkolb 10:50, 30 March 2006 (UTC) * Saying that "It's kind of a well known sexual myth-joke." sounds like a pretty good reason to keep an article on the subject, mythical or not. Silensor 04:01, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per TBC --Mmx1 15:36, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge per nom. Fishhead64 06:28, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge/redirect; whilst there may be a case that this material *does* belong, the article seems to be describing essentially the same thing as Cleveland steamer into which it might be merged. And for consistency, whatever's decided for this article should apply to Hot Karl as well. Fourohfour 12:27, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Cleveland steamer, if it survives AfD. Redirect to the sex slang article if the before mentioned target is deleted or redirected.  young  american  (talk) 20:47, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * CONDEMNETH TO WIKIIIIIII-HELLLLLLLL!!!!!. BD2412  T 21:39, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Is that a "keep" or "delete" then? ;-) Fourohfour 12:04, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or redirect to sexual slang. See also Articles for deletion/Hot Carl and Articles for deletion/Hot Karl, enough time has been wasted on this crap.  cough.  Silensor 03:59, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or Redirect It just doesn't matter enough.Thatfunkymunki 05:57, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, this is just another variation on Cleveland steamer anyway, as noted above. Radagast83 19:43, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per my vote at Articles_for_deletion/Cleveland_steamer_%28second_nomination%29. Anyone who voted delete here should go there too. GT 22:17, 5 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.