Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot Dogma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 15:06, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Hot Dogma

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to satisfy the notability criteria. FamblyCat94 (talk) 03:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to TISM. No significant coverage found, but obviously worth a redirect. --Michig (talk) 07:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  14:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Charted in the ARIA top 100: passes WP:BAND#2.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Charted in Australia. Doctorhawkes (talk) 02:04, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as it charted in Australia. Ca2james (talk) 02:04, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.